I didn’t realize that when I posted my last blog entry “Have You Defined Your Blog Rules of Engagement”, that I would so quickly see a press release outlining the termination of the CFO of publicly held Francesca’s. As the article highlighted, the CFO of the company had been very active in his usage of LinkedIn and Twitter. However, that was not where he ran afoul. As later press releases started bringing more details to the table, it was rather shocking some of the postings that he had actually made on Twitter.
As it was outlined in the WSJ article, choice postings include;
- “Board Meeting. Good numbers=Happy Board”
- “Draft S-1, pages of risks (sigh). I tell lawyers to add the risk that a meteor strikes earth, killing all life causing investors to lose”
- “getting ready for a big SEC filing”
Needless to say, there were more postings that carried this same type of theme, as well as the highly “articulated” points of view carried in his previous posts. It really is disheartening to think that an individual with this level of “discretion” would be considered a peer.
These postings are not in error because the company was a publicly held entity. These would have been serious transgressions even in a private company. If you have been entrusted with the CFO post, public or private, there is an inherent level of trust with your Board, fellow Executive team members, and investors that needs to be maintained. There’s also a level of communication that needs to be maintained from an internal perspective as well and these postings were certainly not done in the spirit of maintaining professionalism.
Although I’m sure it won’t be the last, I would hope that we don’t see these situations with any degree of regularity as C-level executives continue to expand their use of social media.
Thanks for reading…
Jeffrey Ishmael










